Sao Tome and Principe vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Sao Tome and Principe
93.31
in 2019
Saint Lucia
94.53
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
74th
Saint Lucia rank
71st
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 94.53 against 93.31 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.22.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 74th and Saint Lucia ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Sao Tome and Principe or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 94.53 against 93.31 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Sao Tome and Principe and Saint Lucia?
- 1.22, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Saint Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 74th and Saint Lucia ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.