Rwanda vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Rwanda
80.33
in 2019
Uruguay
80.33
in 2019
Rwanda rank
109th
Uruguay rank
109th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Uruguay
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 80.33 against 80.33 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 109th and Uruguay ranks 109th of 188 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Rwanda or Uruguay?
Rwanda, at 80.33 against 80.33 in Uruguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Rwanda and Uruguay?
0, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uruguay?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Rwanda and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Rwanda ranks 109th and Uruguay ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.