Namibia vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Namibia
99.06
in 2019
Singapore
99.16
in 2019
Namibia rank
46th
Singapore rank
43rd

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Namibia
  • Singapore
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 99.16 against 99.06 in Namibia, a difference of 0.1.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 46th and Singapore ranks 43rd of 188 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Namibia or Singapore?
Singapore, at 99.16 against 99.06 in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Namibia and Singapore?
0.1, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Singapore?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Namibia and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Namibia ranks 46th and Singapore ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.