Micronesia, Federated States of vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Micronesia, Federated States of
85.77
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
86.55
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
95th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
93rd
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 86.55 against 85.77 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0.78.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 95th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 93rd of 190 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Micronesia, Federated States of or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 86.55 against 85.77 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Micronesia, Federated States of and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.78, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 95th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 93rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.