Statizoid

Micronesia (country) vs Seychelles: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Micronesia (country)
85.77
in 2019
Seychelles
86.61
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
94th
Seychelles rank
91st

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Seychelles
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 86.61 against 85.77 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.84.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 94th and Seychelles ranks 91st of 188 countries.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Micronesia (country) or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 86.61 against 85.77 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Micronesia (country) and Seychelles?
0.84, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Seychelles?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Micronesia (country) and Seychelles rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Micronesia (country) ranks 94th and Seychelles ranks 91st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.