Mauritania vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Mauritania
73.64
in 2019
Tonga
70.29
in 2019
Mauritania rank
130th
Tonga rank
132nd

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Mauritania
  • Tonga
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 73.64 against 70.29 in Tonga, a difference of 3.35.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Tonga ahead.

Mauritania ranks 130th and Tonga ranks 132nd of 188 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Mauritania or Tonga?
Mauritania, at 73.64 against 70.29 in Tonga as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Mauritania and Tonga?
3.35, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tonga?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Mauritania and Tonga rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Mauritania ranks 130th and Tonga ranks 132nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.