Malaysia vs United States of America: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Malaysia
97.7
in 2019
United States of America
97.28
in 2019
Malaysia rank
60th
United States of America rank
62nd
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Malaysia
- United States of America
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 97.7 against 97.28 in United States of America, a difference of 0.42.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was United States of America ahead.
Malaysia ranks 60th and United States of America ranks 62nd of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Malaysia or United States of America?
- Malaysia, at 97.7 against 97.28 in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Malaysia and United States of America?
- 0.42, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and United States of America?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and United States of America rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Malaysia ranks 60th and United States of America ranks 62nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.