Madagascar vs Malawi: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Madagascar
76.3
in 2019
Malawi
77.41
in 2019
Madagascar rank
123rd
Malawi rank
121st

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 77.41 against 76.3 in Madagascar, a difference of 1.11.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Malawi ahead.

Madagascar ranks 123rd and Malawi ranks 121st of 188 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Madagascar or Malawi?
Malawi, at 77.41 against 76.3 in Madagascar as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Madagascar and Malawi?
1.11, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Malawi?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Madagascar and Malawi rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Madagascar ranks 123rd and Malawi ranks 121st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.