Kiribati vs Palestine: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Kiribati
80.33
in 2019
Palestine
81.45
in 2019
Kiribati rank
111th
Palestine rank
109th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Kiribati
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 81.45 against 80.33 in Kiribati, a difference of 1.12.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 111th and Palestine ranks 109th of 191 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Kiribati or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 81.45 against 80.33 in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Kiribati and Palestine?
- 1.12, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Palestine?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Palestine rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Kiribati ranks 111th and Palestine ranks 109th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.