Jamaica vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Jamaica
76.99
in 2019
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
75.31
in 2019
Jamaica rank
124th
Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank
127th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Jamaica
- Lao People’s Democratic Republic
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 76.99 against 75.31 in Lao People’s Democratic Republic, a difference of 1.68.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lao People’s Democratic Republic ahead.
Jamaica ranks 124th and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 127th of 190 countries.
Lao People’s Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Jamaica or Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
- Jamaica, at 76.99 against 75.31 in Lao People’s Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Jamaica and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
- 1.68, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Jamaica ranks 124th and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 127th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.