Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Equatorial Guinea
0
in 2019
Eritrea
0
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
181st
Eritrea rank
181st

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
00.20.40.60.81201420162019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 against 0 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Eritrea ranks 181st of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Equatorial Guinea or Eritrea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 against 0 in Eritrea as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Eritrea ranks 181st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.