Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Eritrea, The State of: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Egypt, Arab Republic of
0
in 2019
Eritrea, The State of
0
in 2019
Egypt, Arab Republic of rank
183rd
Eritrea, The State of rank
183rd
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Egypt, Arab Republic of
- Eritrea, The State of
How they compare
Egypt, Arab Republic of currently reports 0 against 0 in Eritrea, The State of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Egypt, Arab Republic of ahead.
Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 183rd and Eritrea, The State of ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
Egypt, Arab Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Egypt, Arab Republic of or Eritrea, The State of?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of, at 0 against 0 in Eritrea, The State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Egypt, Arab Republic of and Eritrea, The State of?
- 0, with Egypt, Arab Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Republic of and Eritrea, The State of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Egypt, Arab Republic of and Eritrea, The State of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 183rd and Eritrea, The State of ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.