Ecuador vs Mongolia: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Ecuador
50.21
in 2019
Mongolia
52.44
in 2019
Ecuador rank
157th
Mongolia rank
156th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mongolia
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 52.44 against 50.21 in Ecuador, a difference of 2.23.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 157th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 188 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Ecuador or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 52.44 against 50.21 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Ecuador and Mongolia?
2.23, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Ecuador ranks 157th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.