Dominican Republic vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Dominican Republic
94.77
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
95.4
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
70th
United Arab Emirates rank
67th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Dominican Republic
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 95.4 against 94.77 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.63.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 70th and United Arab Emirates ranks 67th of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Dominican Republic or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 95.4 against 94.77 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Dominican Republic and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.63, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Dominican Republic ranks 70th and United Arab Emirates ranks 67th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.