Dominica vs Grenada: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Dominica
90.38
in 2019
Grenada
90.38
in 2019
Dominica rank
75th
Grenada rank
75th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Dominica
  • Grenada
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 90.38 against 90.38 in Grenada, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 75th and Grenada ranks 75th of 188 countries.

Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Dominica or Grenada?
Dominica, at 90.38 against 90.38 in Grenada as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Dominica and Grenada?
0, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Grenada?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Dominica and Grenada rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Dominica ranks 75th and Grenada ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.