Cyprus vs Georgia: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Cyprus
99.58
in 2019
Georgia
99.58
in 2019
Cyprus rank
37th
Georgia rank
37th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Cyprus
  • Georgia
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 99.58 against 99.58 in Georgia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 37th and Georgia ranks 37th of 188 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Cyprus or Georgia?
Cyprus, at 99.58 against 99.58 in Georgia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Cyprus and Georgia?
0, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Georgia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Cyprus and Georgia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Cyprus ranks 37th and Georgia ranks 37th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.