Democratic Republic of Congo vs Togo: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Democratic Republic of Congo
27.62
in 2019
Togo
25.1
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
175th
Togo rank
177th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Togo
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 27.62 against 25.1 in Togo, a difference of 2.52.
That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Togo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th and Togo ranks 177th of 188 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Democratic Republic of Congo or Togo?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 27.62 against 25.1 in Togo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Togo?
- 2.52, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Togo?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Togo rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th and Togo ranks 177th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.