China vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

China
95.06
in 2019
Mauritius
96.81
in 2019
China rank
66th
Mauritius rank
64th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • China
  • Mauritius
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 96.81 against 95.06 in China, a difference of 1.75.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

China ranks 66th and Mauritius ranks 64th of 188 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), China or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 96.81 against 95.06 in China as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between China and Mauritius?
1.75, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Mauritius?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do China and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
China ranks 66th and Mauritius ranks 64th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.