Statizoid

Chad vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Chad
28.45
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo
27.62
in 2019
Chad rank
174th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
175th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Chad
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
0102030201420162019

How they compare

Chad currently reports 28.45 against 27.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.83.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 174th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th of 188 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Chad or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Chad, at 28.45 against 27.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0.83, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Chad ranks 174th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.