Cameroon vs Guinea: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Cameroon
32.22
in 2019
Guinea
35.15
in 2019
Cameroon rank
172nd
Guinea rank
169th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Cameroon
  • Guinea
010203040201420162019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 35.15 against 32.22 in Cameroon, a difference of 2.93.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 172nd and Guinea ranks 169th of 188 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Cameroon or Guinea?
Guinea, at 35.15 against 32.22 in Cameroon as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Cameroon and Guinea?
2.93, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Guinea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Cameroon and Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Cameroon ranks 172nd and Guinea ranks 169th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.