Cameroon vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Cameroon
32.22
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo
27.62
in 2019
Cameroon rank
172nd
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
175th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Cameroon
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 32.22 against 27.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 4.6.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 172nd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Cameroon or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Cameroon, at 32.22 against 27.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Cameroon and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 4.6, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Cameroon ranks 172nd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.