Burundi vs Congo: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Burundi
25.1
in 2019
Congo
13.39
in 2019
Burundi rank
177th
Congo rank
180th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Burundi
  • Congo
0102030201420162019

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 25.1 against 13.39 in Congo, a difference of 11.71.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.9 times Congo's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 177th and Congo ranks 180th of 188 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Burundi or Congo?
Burundi, at 25.1 against 13.39 in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Burundi and Congo?
11.71, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Congo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Burundi and Congo rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Burundi ranks 177th and Congo ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.