Azerbaijan vs Comoros: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Azerbaijan
89.54
in 2019
Comoros
89.54
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
82nd
Comoros rank
82nd

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Comoros
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 89.54 against 89.54 in Comoros, a difference of 0.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 82nd and Comoros ranks 82nd of 188 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Azerbaijan or Comoros?
Azerbaijan, at 89.54 against 89.54 in Comoros as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Azerbaijan and Comoros?
0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Comoros?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Azerbaijan and Comoros rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Azerbaijan ranks 82nd and Comoros ranks 82nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.