Argentina vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time
- Argentina
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 30.96 against 27.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 3.34.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Argentina ranks 173rd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Argentina or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Argentina, at 30.96 against 27.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Argentina and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 3.34, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- Argentina ranks 173rd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.