Argentina vs Cameroon: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours)

Argentina
30.96
in 2019
Cameroon
32.22
in 2019
Argentina rank
173rd
Cameroon rank
172nd

Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Argentina
  • Cameroon
0102030201420162019

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 32.22 against 30.96 in Argentina, a difference of 1.26.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 173rd and Cameroon ranks 172nd of 188 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours), Argentina or Cameroon?
Cameroon, at 32.22 against 30.96 in Argentina as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours) between Argentina and Cameroon?
1.26, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cameroon?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Argentina and Cameroon rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
Argentina ranks 173rd and Cameroon ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.