Antigua and Barbuda vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance
Antigua and Barbuda
80.33
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
80.33
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
111th
Papua New Guinea rank
111th
Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 80.33 against 80.33 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 111th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance, Antigua and Barbuda or Papua New Guinea?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 80.33 against 80.33 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance between Antigua and Barbuda and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: documentary compliance?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 111th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.