Ukraine vs Yemen, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Ukraine
61.29
in 2014
Yemen, Republic of
62.9
in 2014
Ukraine rank
133rd
Yemen, Republic of rank
130th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Ukraine
- Yemen, Republic of
How they compare
Yemen, Republic of currently reports 62.9 against 61.29 in Ukraine, a difference of 1.61.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Yemen, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Ukraine ranks 133rd and Yemen, Republic of ranks 130th of 183 countries.
Yemen, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Yemen, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.32 | 62.26 | 11.94 | Yemen, Republic of |
| 2010s | 56.45 | 65.48 | 9.03 | Yemen, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Ukraine or Yemen, Republic of?
- Yemen, Republic of, at 62.9 against 61.29 in Ukraine as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Ukraine and Yemen, Republic of?
- 1.61, with Yemen, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Yemen, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Ukraine and Yemen, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Ukraine ranks 133rd and Yemen, Republic of ranks 130th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.