Trinidad and Tobago vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Trinidad and Tobago
83.87
in 2014
Uruguay
83.87
in 2014
Trinidad and Tobago rank
52nd
Uruguay rank
52nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Uruguay
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 83.87 against 83.87 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uruguay ahead.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Trinidad and Tobago averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.52 | 70 | 5.48 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 80.65 | 76.77 | 3.87 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Trinidad and Tobago or Uruguay?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 83.87 against 83.87 in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
- 0, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.