Sudan vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Sudan
32.26
in 2014
Zambia
20.97
in 2014
Sudan rank
165th
Zambia rank
167th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 32.26 against 20.97 in Zambia, a difference of 11.29.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.5 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zambia ahead.
Sudan ranks 165th and Zambia ranks 167th of 181 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.81 | 11.29 | 4.52 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 32.26 | 19.03 | 13.23 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Sudan or Zambia?
- Sudan, at 32.26 against 20.97 in Zambia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Sudan and Zambia?
- 11.29, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Sudan ranks 165th and Zambia ranks 167th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.