Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Thailand: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Saint Kitts and Nevis
87.1
in 2014
Thailand
85.48
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
41st
Thailand rank
43rd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Thailand
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 87.1 against 85.48 in Thailand, a difference of 1.62.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st and Thailand ranks 43rd of 184 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.29 | 79.35 | 1.94 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 86.77 | 85.48 | 1.29 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Thailand?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 87.1 against 85.48 in Thailand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Thailand?
- 1.62, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Thailand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Thailand rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st and Thailand ranks 43rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.