Sri Lanka vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Sri Lanka
85.48
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
87.1
in 2014
Sri Lanka rank
43rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
41st
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 87.1 against 85.48 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.62.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 43rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 184 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.32 | 81.29 | 10.97 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 78.39 | 86.77 | 8.39 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Sri Lanka or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 87.1 against 85.48 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Sri Lanka and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 1.62, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Sri Lanka and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 43rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.