South Africa vs Vietnam: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
South Africa
72.58
in 2014
Vietnam
72.58
in 2014
South Africa rank
100th
Vietnam rank
100th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- South Africa
- Vietnam
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 72.58 against 72.58 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Vietnam has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 100th and Vietnam ranks 100th of 184 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 70 | 20 | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 63.87 | 72.58 | 8.71 | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), South Africa or Vietnam?
- South Africa, at 72.58 against 72.58 in Vietnam as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between South Africa and Vietnam?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Vietnam?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Africa and Vietnam rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- South Africa ranks 100th and Vietnam ranks 100th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.