Sierra Leone vs Ukraine: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Sierra Leone
61.29
in 2014
Ukraine
61.29
in 2014
Sierra Leone rank
133rd
Ukraine rank
133rd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Sierra Leone
- Ukraine
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 61.29 against 61.29 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 133rd and Ukraine ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.58 | 50.32 | 2.26 | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 60.32 | 56.45 | 3.87 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Sierra Leone or Ukraine?
- Sierra Leone, at 61.29 against 61.29 in Ukraine as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Sierra Leone and Ukraine?
- 0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Ukraine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Sierra Leone and Ukraine rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Sierra Leone ranks 133rd and Ukraine ranks 133rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.