Rwanda vs Yemen: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Rwanda
62.9
in 2014
Yemen
62.9
in 2014
Rwanda rank
128th
Yemen rank
128th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Yemen
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 62.9 against 62.9 in Yemen, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 128th and Yemen ranks 128th of 181 countries.

Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Yemen Difference Ahead
2000s 17.74 62.26 44.52 Yemen
2010s 57.1 65.48 8.39 Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Rwanda or Yemen?
Rwanda, at 62.9 against 62.9 in Yemen as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Rwanda and Yemen?
0, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Yemen?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Rwanda and Yemen rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Rwanda ranks 128th and Yemen ranks 128th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.