Russian Federation vs Tunisia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Russian Federation
75.16
in 2014
Tunisia
74.19
in 2014
Russian Federation rank
92nd
Tunisia rank
93rd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Russian Federation
- Tunisia
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 75.16 against 74.19 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.97.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 92nd and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.35 | 66.45 | 2.9 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 71.35 | 78.06 | 6.71 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Russian Federation or Tunisia?
- Russian Federation, at 75.16 against 74.19 in Tunisia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Russian Federation and Tunisia?
- 0.97, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tunisia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Russian Federation and Tunisia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Russian Federation ranks 92nd and Tunisia ranks 93rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.