Qatar vs Slovak Republic: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Qatar
80.65
in 2014
Slovak Republic
80.65
in 2014
Qatar rank
72nd
Slovak Republic rank
72nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Qatar
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 80.65 against 80.65 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Qatar ahead.
Qatar ranks 72nd and Slovak Republic ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 1 and Slovak Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.19 | 70.97 | 3.23 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 77.42 | 80.65 | 3.23 | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Qatar or Slovak Republic?
- Qatar, at 80.65 against 80.65 in Slovak Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Qatar and Slovak Republic?
- 0, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Slovak Republic?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Qatar and Slovak Republic rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Qatar ranks 72nd and Slovak Republic ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.