Puerto Rico vs Serbia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Puerto Rico
82.26
in 2014
Serbia
82.26
in 2014
Puerto Rico rank
64th
Serbia rank
64th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Puerto Rico
- Serbia
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 82.26 against 82.26 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 64th of 183 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.26 | 70.97 | 11.29 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 82.26 | 81.29 | 0.9677 | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Puerto Rico or Serbia?
- Puerto Rico, at 82.26 against 82.26 in Serbia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Puerto Rico and Serbia?
- 0, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Puerto Rico and Serbia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Puerto Rico ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 64th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.