Portugal vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Portugal
85.48
in 2014
Sri Lanka
85.48
in 2014
Portugal rank
43rd
Sri Lanka rank
43rd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Portugal
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 85.48 against 85.48 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 43rd and Sri Lanka ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.26 | 70.32 | 11.94 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 85.48 | 78.39 | 7.1 | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Portugal or Sri Lanka?
- Portugal, at 85.48 against 85.48 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Portugal and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Portugal and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Portugal ranks 43rd and Sri Lanka ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.