Poland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Poland
83.87
in 2014
Trinidad and Tobago
83.87
in 2014
Poland rank
52nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
52nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Poland
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Poland currently reports 83.87 against 83.87 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 52nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.03 | 64.52 | 14.52 | Poland |
| 2010s | 82.26 | 80.65 | 1.61 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Poland or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Poland, at 83.87 against 83.87 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Poland and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Poland and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Poland ranks 52nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.