Peru vs Saudi Arabia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Peru
79.03
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
79.03
in 2014
Peru rank
75th
Saudi Arabia rank
75th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Peru
  • Saudi Arabia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Peru currently reports 79.03 against 79.03 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 75th and Saudi Arabia ranks 75th of 181 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 62.58 66.45 3.87 Saudi Arabia
2010s 79.03 79.03 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Peru or Saudi Arabia?
Peru, at 79.03 against 79.03 in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Peru and Saudi Arabia?
0, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Saudi Arabia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Peru and Saudi Arabia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Peru ranks 75th and Saudi Arabia ranks 75th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.