Pakistan vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Pakistan
76.77
in 2014
Suriname
75.81
in 2014
Pakistan rank
87th
Suriname rank
88th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Pakistan
- Suriname
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 76.77 against 75.81 in Suriname, a difference of 0.96.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Suriname ahead.
Pakistan ranks 87th and Suriname ranks 88th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 75.16 | 5.16 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 76.84 | 75.81 | 1.03 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Pakistan or Suriname?
- Pakistan, at 76.77 against 75.81 in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Pakistan and Suriname?
- 0.96, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Pakistan and Suriname rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Pakistan ranks 87th and Suriname ranks 88th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.