Netherlands vs United States: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Netherlands
96.77
in 2014
United States
97.74
in 2014
Netherlands rank
7th
United States rank
6th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Netherlands
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 97.74 against 96.77 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.97.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Netherlands ranks 7th and United States ranks 6th of 183 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.77 | 98.39 | 1.61 | United States |
| 2010s | 96.77 | 98.13 | 1.35 | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Netherlands or United States?
- United States, at 97.74 against 96.77 in Netherlands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Netherlands and United States?
- 0.97, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and United States?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Netherlands and United States rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Netherlands ranks 7th and United States ranks 6th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.