Netherlands vs Sweden: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Netherlands
96.77
in 2014
Sweden
96.77
in 2014
Netherlands rank
7th
Sweden rank
7th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Netherlands
  • Sweden
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 96.77 against 96.77 in Sweden, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Netherlands ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 7th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 96.77 96.77 0
2010s 96.77 96.77 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Netherlands or Sweden?
Netherlands, at 96.77 against 96.77 in Sweden as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Netherlands and Sweden?
0, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Sweden?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Netherlands and Sweden rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Netherlands ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 7th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.