Montenegro vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Montenegro
83.87
in 2014
Trinidad and Tobago
83.87
in 2014
Montenegro rank
52nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
52nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Montenegro
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 83.87 against 83.87 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 52nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.87 | 64.52 | 19.35 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 83.87 | 80.65 | 3.23 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Montenegro or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Montenegro, at 83.87 against 83.87 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Montenegro and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Montenegro and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Montenegro ranks 52nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.