Mexico vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Mexico
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 88.44 against 85.48 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 2.96.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Mexico ranks 40th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.03 | 84.19 | 5.16 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 87.63 | 86.13 | 1.5 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Mexico or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Mexico, at 88.44 against 85.48 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Mexico and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 2.96, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mexico and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Mexico ranks 40th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.