Mexico vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Mexico
88.44
in 2014
Saint Lucia
85.48
in 2014
Mexico rank
40th
Saint Lucia rank
43rd

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Mexico
  • Saint Lucia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 88.44 against 85.48 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 2.96.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 40th and Saint Lucia ranks 43rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
2000s 79.03 80.65 1.61 Saint Lucia
2010s 87.63 85.48 2.15 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Mexico or Saint Lucia?
Mexico, at 88.44 against 85.48 in Saint Lucia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Mexico and Saint Lucia?
2.96, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Saint Lucia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Mexico and Saint Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Mexico ranks 40th and Saint Lucia ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.