Mexico vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Mexico
88.44
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
87.1
in 2014
Mexico rank
40th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
41st
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Mexico
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 88.44 against 87.1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1.34.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Mexico ranks 40th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.03 | 81.29 | 2.26 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 87.63 | 86.77 | 0.8581 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Mexico or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mexico, at 88.44 against 87.1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Mexico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 1.34, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mexico and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Mexico ranks 40th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.