Mauritania vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Mauritania
45.16
in 2014
Palestine, State of
45.16
in 2014
Mauritania rank
158th
Palestine, State of rank
158th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Mauritania
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 45.16 against 45.16 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Mauritania ranks 158th and Palestine, State of ranks 158th of 184 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.94 | 41.94 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 44.52 | 43.87 | 0.6452 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Mauritania or Palestine, State of?
- Mauritania, at 45.16 against 45.16 in Palestine, State of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Mauritania and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Palestine, State of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritania and Palestine, State of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Mauritania ranks 158th and Palestine, State of ranks 158th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.