Marshall Islands vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Marshall Islands
66.13
in 2014
Tonga
66.13
in 2014
Marshall Islands rank
115th
Tonga rank
115th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Marshall Islands
- Tonga
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 66.13 against 66.13 in Tonga, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 115th and Tonga ranks 115th of 181 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.13 | 64.19 | 1.94 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 66.13 | 66.13 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Marshall Islands or Tonga?
- Marshall Islands, at 66.13 against 66.13 in Tonga as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Marshall Islands and Tonga?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Tonga?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Marshall Islands and Tonga rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Marshall Islands ranks 115th and Tonga ranks 115th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.