Lebanon vs Paraguay: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Lebanon
58.06
in 2014
Paraguay
58.06
in 2014
Lebanon rank
140th
Paraguay rank
140th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Lebanon
- Paraguay
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 58.06 against 58.06 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Paraguay ahead.
Lebanon ranks 140th and Paraguay ranks 140th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.35 | 53.23 | 3.87 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 57.1 | 55.16 | 1.94 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Lebanon or Paraguay?
- Lebanon, at 58.06 against 58.06 in Paraguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Lebanon and Paraguay?
- 0, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Paraguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Lebanon and Paraguay rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Lebanon ranks 140th and Paraguay ranks 140th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.